tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jul 01 06:01:20 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: models of excellent language use

MorphemeAddict ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: models of excellent language use
• Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:00:39 EDT

In a message dated 2004-07-01 8:35:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:

> What we produce is not appropriate for beginners to *copy*. We obviously
> think it's worth reading; otherwise, we'd not have put it out for general
> consumption.
> 

Are they simply to be read in isolation then, with no discussion about their 
strengths and weaknesses?  How do those translations measure up to the 
standard of "native" usage?

lay'tel SIvten

• Prev by Date: "majatlh neH"
• Next by Date: Re: models of excellent language use
• Previous by thread: Re: models of excellent language use
• Next by thread: Re: models of excellent language use
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level