tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jan 30 10:01:55 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: wa'DIch

Scott Willis ([email protected])

From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: wa'DIch
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 11:09:26 -0500
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: wa'DIch

> > ngabwI':
> >  I will
> > keep an eye out for canon that allows this, but until I am able to find
it,
> > it seems too close to the English to be true.
>
> SuStel:
> It's not true.  Qanqor knows this use doesn't seem to be correct, but he
> uses it anyway.

Thank you, that makes alot more sense. I appreciate it.

--ngabwI'
Beginners' Grammarian,
Klingon Language Institute
http://kli.org/
HovpoH 701106.0

References:
- KLBC: wa'DIch
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: wa'DIch
  - From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>
- Re: wa'DIch
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Help with bible verse
Next by Date: Re: Help with bible verse
Prev by thread: Re: wa'DIch
Next by thread: Re: wa'DIch
Index(es):