tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 24 20:39:36 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

[tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?
• Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:40:06 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' lay'tel SIvten:
>with suffixes for perfective aspect (-pu', -ta') and continuous (ie
>imperfective) aspect (-taH, -lI'), what is the aspect of unmarked verbs?

It's unspecified.  Without context, it could be anything.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: yuch watlh 'ej Human jat
• Next by Date: [tlhIngan-Hol] Hamlet 1 & 2
• Previous by thread: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?
• Next by thread: [tlhIngan-Hol] Re: KLBC: default aspect?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level