tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 11 20:16:31 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: nom ghel, nom jang

...Paul ([email protected])

• From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
• Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:50:24 -0800 (PST)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <TIDGE3WB6KFJDDBFC093Y1LF1YE953.4028d853@quvar><[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, ...Paul wrote:
> We do have the word /'oS/ that could be pressed into service if we wanted
> to be REALLY explicit:  /Duj 'oSbogh mu'/ "The word that represents the
> ship" (Oh, hrm, does /'oS/ mean "represent" in terms of legal
> representation?)

I just realized I forgot to put the emphasis on the word /mu'/:

Duj 'oSbogh mu''e'

...Paul

 **        Have a question that reality just can't answer?        **
  ** Visit Project Galactic Guide http://www.galactic-guide.com/ **
     "If you were plowing a field, which would you rather use?
         Two strong oxen or 1024 chickens?" -- Seymour Cray

• References:
  • Re: nom ghel, nom jang
    • From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom ghel, nom jang
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
  • Re: nom ghel, nom jang
    • From: "...Paul" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
• Next by Date: mu'mey 'ar?
• Prev by thread: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
• Next by thread: Re: nom ghel, nom jang
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level