tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 27 17:20:19 2003
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: More than one rover?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sangqar (Sean Healy)" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: More than one rover?
>
> I quote MO, discussing the inclusion of {-Ha'} with the rovers::
>
> It was felt best not to argue with Klingon tradition.
I believe there was a much more logical reason for {Ha'}'s inclusion with
rovers:
If it were to be a type 1 suffix, it would be much more difficult to negate
a verb used reflexively.
>
> >Christoph
>
> Sangqar
--ngabwI'
HovpoH juHDaq:
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ngabwi/
HovpoH 699838.0