tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 26 21:39:00 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

More than one rover?

• From: "christoph.pichlmann" <[email protected]>
• Subject: More than one rover?
• Date: 24 Mar 2003 15:20:41 +0100

While reading TKD again, I noticed that on page 48/49 the example
"nuQaw'qu'be' " is given. And although it clearly contains TWO rovers,
pojwI' (the program) does not mark it as wrong.

Does that mean then, that unlike other suffixes rovers may be used more
than once per word? It surely would be fitting, as the two rovers(-qu'
and -be' in this example) do not exclude each other, as the other
suffixes do.

If so - shouldn t the rovers then be grouped too?


Christoph

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: More than one rover?
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Problems?
• Next by Date: Re: Klingon sounds and IPA (was Re: {oy}, diphthong or V+C)
• Prev by thread: Problems?
• Next by thread: Re: More than one rover?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level