tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Sep 14 07:28:09 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: KIDC on KLI



ja' Qov:
> --Qor'etlh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > FYI:
> > The subject is: Klingon Language Institute.
> > To read that message and others in the same conversation thread, go
> to:

> vIlaD.  jIjang.  wa' bepwI' vIqaw.  latlh vIghovbe'.

> vIt chaH.  po'chugh vay' qoj nom ghojlaHchugh, wIlaj.  reHchugh neH
> qoj Hol qech yajbe'law' wIboQ, 'ach loQ wIbuSHa'.  

> I joined the KLI with an interest in speaking pure, conservative
> Okrandian Klingon -- in fact I *ignored* the KLI for years because I
> assumed that in order to translate the Bible they had to be making up
> their own rules.  How's *that* for elitist?  Standards so exclusive I
> wasn't going to play with anyone but me!  I had independently arrived
> at an appreciation for the rigid constraints we put on "correct"
> Klingon.  Therefore I don't think that there is a KLI elite that
> railroads everyone into a self-created concept of what is correct.  

> But it is true that we have an elite with an agenda.  The agenda is
> adherence to strict Klingon grammar, and the methods of eliciting this
> behaviour include praise and good treatment for those who comply, and
> ridicule, ad hominum attacks, arguing our superiority over and/or
> ignoring those who do not.  From my experience these are the usual

'Iv wIbuSHa'? tlhIngan Hol HaDmeH latlh 'obe' tu'be'lu'!

> techniques used in male-dominated academic institutions, and I have
> learned them well.  

> nuvpu' puS boweghqangchugh, chaq mIw bochoHlaH, 'ach ghaytan
> chetammoHta'DI' nargh chu'wI'pu'.

> ==
> Qov - pab 'utlh


- tuv'el



Back to archive top level