tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Oct 30 20:01:49 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: -ghach
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: -ghach
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 20:15:38 -0500
From: William H. Martin <[email protected]>
>I think the {lo'laHghach} example is not a very good one; likely
>one Okrand would retract now if he had the opportunity.
>Subsequent to it being included in the book, he has refined his
>approach to both the root verb and {-ghach}.
Most likely, {-ghach} entered the language before {lo'laH} did.
{lo'laHghach} have retained its meaning after {lo'laH} got a new one.
SuStel
Stardate 98831.0