tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 26 12:21:49 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: wanI' Huj

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: wanI' Huj
• Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 15:21:47 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "d'Armond Speers" at May 26, 98 06:25:08 am

According to d'Armond Speers:
> 
> 
> povam jISay''eghmoHtaHvIS qaS wanI' Hujqu'.  reghchoH ghIchwIj!  Hoch
> nguvmoH 'IwwIj.  mughIjqu' ghu'vam; not regh ghIchwIj.  jIlImbe'.  regh 'e'
> vImev 'e' vInID.  porghwIj HaHlaw' 'Iwwij.  bIQ DoqmoH 'IwwIj.  Doqqu'
> qamDu'wIj, ngIbDu'wIj, 'uSDu'wIj je.  jIregh 'e' mevDI' jISay''eghnISqa'moH!
> 
> --Holtej

Do'Ha'. DuHIvlaw' ghIch SuvwI'pu' machqu'!

bIropbe' 'e' vItul.

charghwI'

• References:
  • wanI' Huj
    • From: "d'Armond Speers" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Inherently Plural Nouns
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: jatmey volume one winter 1995, HIboQ
• Prev by thread: wanI' Huj
• Next by thread: Re: wanI' Huj
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level