tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 19 12:32:58 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Quj bej Holtej qorDu'
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Quj bej Holtej qorDu'
- Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 14:32:53 CDT
> Well, /lo'laHghach/ has two interpretations.
>
> 1. V + laH + ghach "ability to use"
> 2. V + ghach (marked) "valuation" (?)
>
canon says {lo'laHghach} means "value" (TKD p.176), my question was
whether this is a marked term or not, i.e. is the verb {lo'laH} a
bisyllabic word or a root {lo'} (NOT "use") + suffix {-laH}?
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
[email protected]