tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 11 22:23:49 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -ghach (oh no)
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: -ghach (oh no)
- Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 22:20:39 -0700
At 17:45 98-05-11 -0700, you wrote:
}From: Qov <[email protected]>
}>And, it's got to be said, while I agree it seems that the nominalization
}of
}>a process is what's happening, that *isn't* what Okrand has said.
}
}I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying Okrand doesn't explicitly
}mention nominalization? What about page 176 of TKD: "{-ghach} nominalizer"?
Okrand does not say that verb + ghach = noun for process of doing verb.
He says verb + ghach = noun
Qov [email protected]
Now on ICQ: 12235599