tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 13 05:47:30 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Invisible Warriors

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Invisible Warriors
• Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1998 07:48:32 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' muHwI':
>I came up with {leghlu'be'bogh SuvwI'pu'}, but that sounds to me like
>"warriors that are not seen". Is that the same?

It's backwards, for one thing.  {SuvwI'pu' luleghlu'be'bogh} would be
correct for "unseen warriors".  Perhaps {...luleghbe'lu'bogh} might
be better, explicitly negating the "see" concept.  If you're going for
"cannot be seen", Voragh's {SuvwI'pu' leghlaHbe'bogh vay'} works okay.
It does sound a lot like a title, "the Warriors Invisible" or similar,
based on its parallelism to "Kahless the Unforgettable".

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Invisible Warriors
    • From: "Quvar muHwI'" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: nuqneH as greeting
• Next by Date: Re: SuvwI'bom
• Prev by thread: Re: Invisible Warriors
• Next by thread: KLBC: adverbial practice
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level