tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 31 17:36:58 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC Nature Phenomenon
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC Nature Phenomenon
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 17:35:54 -0800
At 21:47 98-01-28 -0800, SuStel wrote:
}Heck, for all we know {SIS} is always used with {-ghach} and never as a
}straight verb. (And before someone jumps on me, saying they don't like that
}and how could I have suggested it, no, I don't actually believe that, but it
}is a valid possibility.)
SuStel yIQoy! The point here is that you -- all of you who have suggested,
asserted, argued or questioned what the subject of the rain may be -- are
not WRONG. We simply DO NOT HAVE the information to decalre any of you
right OR wrong. There isn't a lot of point arguing about which is most
likely, because there are a lot of good candidates and we know from
experience with natural languages that logic isn't going to play a large
part in it.
I think the first time this thread came around while I was on the list I
suggested that it might be {SIS ta' targh}, to emphasis the point that the
idiom could be ANYTHING.
Qov [email protected]
Beginners' Grammarian