tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 24 22:02:47 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Quj vIQuj



ja' Lt Barrows <[email protected]>:
>*Populous* vIQuj 'e' vItIv...

wa'logh Qujvam vIlegh.  QujwI' vIbejchoH, 'ach Quj QIjqangbe' ghaH.
vaj ta'Daj vIyajbe'taH.  QIt loQ vIyajchoH.  Quj paq vInej.  vIlaDDI'
vIyajbej.  Dajlaw' Quj.  'ach vIQujta'be' jIH.

>pabpo'vaD: I wasn't certain about the usage of <ra'>, as regards its use as a
>verb of saying. In some places I used a quote with it, so I used a non-object
>prefix. "<peHIv> jIra'." In other cases, I was saying, "I command them" to do
>something, so I used "vIra'". I'd like some opinions about the correctness or
>lack thereof regarding my usage of <ra'>. tulughmoHneS.

>From the phrase {chay' jura'} on TKD p.70, I tend to use {ra'} as either a
verb of saying or with a {-meH} clause.  I don't think I would say something
like {bIjaH 'e' vIra'} for "I command you to go."  I'd say {yIjaH qara'}, or
just possibly {bIjaHmeH qara'}.

-- ghunchu'wI'




Back to archive top level