tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 24 09:38:43 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: "to be"
>Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 15:13:19 -0800 (PST)
>From: "Robyn Stewart" <[email protected]>
>
>Chakotay writes:
>> so, my question is, is there a Klingon verb that means "to be"?
>
>The answer is no. Explicitly no from Marc Okrand.
Quite explicitly so. He said at a qep'a' that when they sprang the "to be
or not to be" request on him, he said to himself that no matter what, there
was no way he was going to put a copula into Klingon, especially not NOW.
~mark