tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 22 23:09:38 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
poH qelDI' tlhIngan Hol mu'tlheghmey
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: poH qelDI' tlhIngan Hol mu'tlheghmey
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 02:09:23 EST
cha' mu'tlheghmey rarmeH mu' {'ej} lo' mu'tlheghmey HochHom
mu' {vaj} lo' HochHom pIm
wot mojaq {-DI'} lo' HochHom pIm
'ej wot mojaq {-taHvIS} lo' HochHom pIm
poH qelnISDI' tlhIngan Hol wot vaj mIwmey pIm ghaj tlhIngan Hol
poH nIb qelnIS mu' {'ej} 'e' vIHarbe'
mu'tlheghmey rarlaH neH mu' {'ej}
poH veb qelnIS mu' {vaj} 'e' vIHarbe'
meq 'oS mu' {vaj}
rarbogh mu' 'oHbe' mu' {vaj} 'ach chay' vang vay' 'e' Del 'oH (mIwvam
vIlo'qang)
poH nIb qelDI' tlhIngan Hol wot, mojaq {-taHvIS} lo'laH qonwI'
SKI: I believe {'ej} joins sentences by joining the action of the verbs, much
as described at length in TKD. I do not feel confined to using it with
concurrent actions alone. I have noticed that the verb suffixes {-DI'} and
{-taHvIS} help tell us the relationship of time that the two clauses' verbs
have, also.
peHruS