tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 17 10:37:42 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Doubts in some words

• From: "Eduardo Fonseca" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Doubts in some words
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 16:38:29 -0300

ja' Alan Anderson 


>Edy wants clarification on some apparent synonyms.  I'll state what I
>understand these words to mean:


    I thank you for the clarification. I would like
other explanation for these ones. Could you give me the 
opposites when possible?


non - be rotten  /// ngIm - be putrid

>{non} have decayed or become putrid

    {non} is the first stage before become {ngIm} ?


Sot - be distressed /// 'IQ - be sad /// QoS - be sorry

poD - be clipped. But it can mean short, quick, in opposite
      of {tIq} - be long  or {naQ} - be full, whole ?

tlhIb - be incompetent; can be the counterpart of 
    {po'} - be skilled, expert?

tun - be soft  can be the counterpart of {let} - be hard
    or {'ugh} - be heavy?

notlh - be obsolet, can be the counterpart of {'Itlh} - advanced 

jen - be high, is the counterpart of {'eS} be low and {run} be short
    (in stature) also?


Thanks again.

Edy

• Prev by Date: Re: taH mu' {'ej}
• Next by Date: Re: la'Hom vs. ra'wI' QIv
• Prev by thread: Doubts in some words
• Next by thread: Re: Doubts in some words
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level