tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 13 08:18:16 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: leng Saj
- From: "Marc Paige"<[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: leng Saj
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 09:49:46 -0600
ja' ghunchu'wI'
>>>
ja'pu' Qov:
>chaq rut jalthlaHbe'bogh SajvaD <ghaH> lulo' tlhInganpu'
ja' SuStel:
>bIQob, Qov! :)
It took me a very long time to realize why Sustel said that. Somehow,
putting a type 5 noun suffix on the subject of a relative clause is
not jarring to me. It...works. The meaning flows very naturally. I
hope we can get some explanation of the grammar behind this sort of
thing soon, so we know how it's *supposed* to work.
<<<
jIQochbe'. Qap pab 'e' vIQub. mu'tlhegh vIyajchu'.
qatlh Qob Qov?
----------------------------
SI'IluD
wa'Hu' jIboghbe'