tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 03 21:30:50 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBC Poetry



mujang charghwI':
>> But I'm
>> still not "feeling" that {tujpu'} implies that the being hot has stopped.
>We disagree, my friend. I see {-pu'} implying a change of
>state, similar to {-choH}, except that {-choH} implies a change
>into a state and {-pu'} implies a change out of a state, while
>{-choHpu'} implies a change out of a state of changing into the
>state -- which means the state is currently engaged.

{-pu'} isn't a type 3 suffix.  *I* don't get an implication of change
from the "perfective" idea.  The concepts of "complete" and "stopped"
overlap in some contexts, but I don't see them as doing so in Klingon
grammar.

I don't interpret {jIyItpu'} as saying I *stopped* walking, only that
I *have* walked.  Whether or not I kept walking isn't indicated.  The
same thing goes for {jIbItpu'}.  I might or might not still be uneasy
after having been uneasy.  I've assumed the context of present tense,
but that's of course not necessary.  In fact, I think future tense is
easier to use to explain my interpretations:  {wa'leS jIyItpu'} "I'll
have walked tomorrow" does not mean I will have quit walking by then.
{cha'leS jIbItpu'} "Three days from now, I will have been uneasy" has
no implication -- for me, at least -- of my becoming calm again.

-- ghunchu'wI'




Back to archive top level