tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 21 16:07:12 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Everybody's favorite verb suffixes - The rovers

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Everybody's favorite verb suffixes - The rovers
• Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 18:18:45 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' DloraH:
>Last year at Praxis I said something which contained [-be'lu'].  MO made a
>comment asking if I was aware of [-be'lu'] and [-lu'be'] and that they have
>different meanings; to which I kindly informed him that I did think about
>which one I wanted for my sentence.

toH!  pabHom QIjruplaw'.

>We didn't discuss it any further.  (We were quietly waiting for the Mark
>Lenard Memorial Service to start.)

nargh 'eb.  pIm bIH 'e' DaH wISovchu', 'ach pImmoHbogh mep wISovbe'.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: Everybody's favorite verb suffixes - The rovers
    • From: TPO <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: [repost] - lutHom
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC Translation of: Re: mu'tlhegh ngo'
• Prev by thread: Re: Everybody's favorite verb suffixes - The rovers
• Next by thread: 'Iv ghaH *matlh*'e'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level