tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 20 17:17:06 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Verbs of Saying
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Verbs of Saying
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 16:58:53 -0400
From: Terrence Donnelly <[email protected]>
>But in these cases, /pong/ has an object, and an utterance, and I got
>the implication from the discussion of /jatlh/ that a verb of saying
>could have either an object or an accompanying utterance, but not
>both. Or would you consider legal something like ?/"bImej vIneH"
>mu'tlhegh vIjatlh/ (translating, I guess as "'I want to leave' I
>speak a sentence")?
The rules so far *do* allow for this possibility, and I do not see any such
implication. This is not a condonement, simply a fact.
SuStel
Stardate 98633.5