tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 24 14:56:55 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qep'a' vaghDIch
- From: SuSvaj <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qep'a' vaghDIch
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 17:00:38 -0500
At 12:20 PM 4/24/98 -0700, you wrote:
>According to Holtej:
>>
>> wa'Hu' maja'chuq *Lawrence jIH je. qep'a' vaghDIch wIqel. [1] DISvam
jISaH
>> 'e' vIwuqta'!
>
>maj.
>
>> wa' ben, cha' ben je loQ belHa' jatlhwI'pu' nIv. wanI'mey law' nab
>> *Lawrence, 'ach jatlhwI' chu'vaD nablaw'. loQ jIbep je 'e' vIchID.
>
>qaStaHvIS qep'a' loSDIch pIj ma''egh jeSwI'pu'. QujtaHvIS
>latlhpu', Quj-pa' HurDaq ghom jatlhwI'pu'. lutmey DIjatlhtaH 'ej
>maqIDtaH. veSDaq majatlh. tachDaq majatlh. Quj wIpoQbe'. DaqDaq
>maghom 'ej majatlh. qay'be'.
>
>jatlhchu'wI' ma'laHchugh Quj vaj Qujvam tIvba' jatlhchu'wI'.
>Quj 'oghmeH jIQubtaH 'ach jIpo'be'. chaq pagh qech QaQ vIjon.
>Quj vIjonbe'chugh lutmey vI'IjtaH 'e' vItIvbej. jIqIDtaH.
>Qujmey vItIvbe'chugh jISaHbe'. qep'a' vaghDIch vItIvtaH.
>
>> jatlhwI' nIv, jatlhwI' chu' wIma'meH Qujmey chu' wI'oghnIS. chaq rut cha'
>> ghom wIchenmoHlaH, 'ach motlh wa' ghom qaq law' ghommey law' qaq puS 'e'
>> vIHar.
>
>rut maghomchu'. rut maghomHa'. ram. not maghomchu'chugh vaj
>Do'Ha'.
>
>> vaj SaqaD, 'ej jIqaD'egh je: qep'a' yIbuS. nuq Data' DaneH?
>
>jatlhlaHbogh juppu'wI' vIghom. maqID. lutmey DIjatlh.
>maQorghchuq. maSaHchuq. Qujmey? Qujmey vItIv je 'ach lutmey
>potlh law' Qujmey potlh puS 'e' vIHar.
>
>If we come up with more creative ways for groups to build
>stories, that might be enjoyable...
nIvqu' qechvam! potlhqu' lutmey 'e' Har tlhInganpu'. chaq qep'a'Daq
ghommey wIchenmoHlaH. jatlhwI'pu' chu', po'wI'pu' je ghajlaH ghommeyvam.
wa' lut qon Hoch ghom. wa' lut ja'wI' wIv ghom nuvpu', 'ej HochvaD lut ja'
nuvvetlh. "Bard" ghaH nuvvetlh. "Performance"meyvam vItIvqu'bej. 'e'
wIta'chugh, ghomwIjDaq SanDar vIneHbej. "Bard" nIvqu' ghaH!
SuSvaj
>
>> Qujmey chu'
>> Da'oghlaH'a'? jatlhwI' chu' wItungHa'meH 'ej jatlhwI' nIv wIma'meH DaH
>> wInabnIS. pagh wItungnIS. quqnIS'a' cha' Quj? Quj pIm wInabnIS'a'?
>> qechmeyraj yIngeH!
>
>qama'ta''a'?
>
>> --Holtej
>>
>> [1] Geez, I never considered this use of /qel/ to be controversial before.
>> Perhaps it's my native English speaker bias; OTOH, /qel/ and /buS/ seem
like
>> totally different concepts to me, distinguishing more than simply a
>> transitive/intransitive distinction. What I *really* want is a transitive
>> way to convey */vay' wIja'chuq/!
>
>I don't consider it to be controversial now. Are you confusing
>{qel} and {qIm}?
>
>charghwI'
>
>