tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 24 14:00:27 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: to be or not to be
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: to be or not to be
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 17:00:15 -0400 (EDT)
ghItlh Qov:
> You'd be in trouble if you tried to say "lunch is the dish the man
> prepares" with this construction, but as long as the type 5 noun
> suffix falls on the noun that is the head of the relative clause,
> this works.
I love that kind of challenges!
qaDmeyvam vIparHa'.
So you mean this is incorrect? (it does sound weird, though)
--> {megh 'oH nay''e' vutbogh loD}
How would you say it? chay' Dajatlh SoH'e'?
Where must the type five suffix come at?
nuqDaq 'oH mojaq vagh Daq'e'?
______________
muHwI'
Stardate 97733.3