tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 29 11:52:37 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: The FAQ section 3.5 -- ~mark
- From: Qorbeq <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: The FAQ section 3.5 -- ~mark
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 96 19:14:31 +0100 (BST)
- Organization: Parallel Dimensions
~mark, seeing as you are (probably?) the grammarian of grammarians can I
just ask, finally, what the overall outcome of all that was ?? Most people
seem to be agreeing but I *think* I've seen a couple of posts that "agree
differently", IYSWIM.
How's about a little list of "acceptable" and "unacceptable", perhaps for
inclusion in the FAQ ?
I think that my previous post had near the end (among other things) several
examples that I wanted grammarian agreement with.
Then finally I can say that I at least *tried* to understand it ... {{:-)
nI'jaj yInlIj, 'ej batlh bIHeghjaj.
Qorbeq
--
+------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| http://www.parallel.demon.co.uk | "Still a newbie!" |
|--- ---+--- ---|
| Parallel Dimensions | pabwIj yIlughmoH jIjatlhHa'chugh |
+------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+