tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 24 14:48:40 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

tlhIngan tIgh tu' *vIq* (was Re: Par'Mach is a Canonical)

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: tlhIngan tIgh tu' *vIq* (was Re: Par'Mach is a Canonical)
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 96 21:03:14 UT

jatlh taDI'oS vIq:

<<< batlh vIparHa'qu' jay'!  tlhIngan Hol vItu'choHDI' vISaHbe', 'ach "TKW" 
vIlaDDI'
batlh vIlegh 'ej SuvwI'na' tIq moj tIqwIj. >>>

toH!  April <tlhIngan tIgh> ngevchoHlu'!  tlhIngan Hol DaghojchoH'a' paqvam 
DalaDDI'?  nom bIghojbejqu'!  majQa'!

SuStel
Stardate 96815.5

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: tlhIngan tIgh tu' *vIq* (was Re: Par'Mach is a Canonical)
    • From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: latlh lut tlhaQ
• Next by Date: Re: Blah blah blah (Was "par'mach" something or other
• Prev by thread: Re: latlh lut tlhaQ
• Next by thread: Re: tlhIngan tIgh tu' *vIq* (was Re: Par'Mach is a Canonical)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level