tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 21 10:25:56 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re:KLBC: Here we go again
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re:KLBC: Here we go again
- Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 19:20:17 +0200
At 04:16 AM 5/20/96 -0700, you wrote:
>[email protected] writes:
>\ What was that something {HIqem}, I could only find {HIq} = "liqour"?
>That's {HI-} (imperative, you-me) + {qem} "bring"; thus {HIqem} is
>"Bring me!". I would have chosen {jIHvaD qa'vIn yIqem} personally, but
>we've already seen how sloppy Klingon is with regard to direct/indirect
>object distinction.
I some how don't ever realy look at the Imperitive Prefixes list. I have a
computer print out of all the other Prefixes and Suffixes, but I'd forgotten
all about that one.
Qapla'
beHwI"av (Only just realizing his name wasn't baHwI"av, which he's sure he
named him self first. Never mind)