tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat May 18 11:37:52 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Murphy chut
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: Murphy chut
- Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 13:41:01 -0500
~mark writes:
>>>lo'laHqu'bogh Quj mI'mey moch pu'beH
>
>>Vocabulary aside, I don't think {moch} "be superior" works this way.
>
>"moch" isn't a verb. It's a noun, meaning "superior", as a captain to a
>lieutenant, or sergeant to a private. The verb for "be superior" is "nIv."
DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'. It's hard to notice everything at once!
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj