tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 27 15:14:11 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Stephen's introduction

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Stephen's introduction
• Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 18:14:38 -0400

In a message dated 96-06-27 02:41:31 EDT, voqHa'wI' wrote:

>It is dangerous to suggest, but isn't "to be" an intransitive
>verb anyways?  One is, and the state that one is in is simply a state tacked
>on to the end of the construct??
>
>I shouldn't have even tried to say that.  It didn't sound right at all.

Yes, you should have!  It was what I just spent several paragraphs trying to
say!

>The point being:   Is {A 'oH B'e'} the same as {B 'oH A'e'} or different?

Hmmm . . . getting ready for that wish list at the qep'a' . . . !

SuStel
Hovjaj 96489.9

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: jIlIHegh vIneH
• Next by Date: Re: Stephen's introduction
• Prev by thread: Re: Stephen's introduction
• Next by thread: Re: Stephen's introduction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level