tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 26 23:43:36 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Believe ... (was Re: Appropriateness)

• From: "Daniel Peter Noll (was Ford Prefect)" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Believe ... (was Re: Appropriateness)
• Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 16:44:47 -1000

>>Speaking of Hol (and to justify this post), I have a simple Hol question:
>>Could "jI (I) + Har (believe) + be' (not) = yIHarbe' (I do not believe)"?

I noticed that the suffix changed over time, you should have written
{jIHarbe'}, right?

How about {jIHar jIneH}...

voqHa'wI'

      oh, no! Two x-files references in a single tlhIngan-Hol post.
      That can't be good...
    ______ __  __ ______ ______ ______
   /_____//_/ / //___  //___  //_____/
  __     ____/ /____/ /__  / /  __
 / /___ / __  // __  // /_/ /___\ \  Hoch yIghuH
/_____//_/ /_//_/ /_//_____//_____/  wej vIt tu'lu'mo'

• Prev by Date: Re: Stephen's introduction
• Next by Date: Postal Course
• Prev by thread: Re: Quantifiers: KLBC
• Next by thread: Re: Believe ... (was Re: Appropriateness)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level