tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 26 22:07:25 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Stephen's introduction



In a message dated 96-06-26 21:52:15 EDT, you write:

>>maHwej ben jIH
>
>The number-forming suffix {-maH} is a *suffix*.  It gets tacked on *after*
>the number: 30 is {wejmaH}.
>
>"I am thirty years ago" or even "I was thirty years ago" (Klingon doesn't
>explicitly indicate past/present/future tense) doesn't make a lot of sense
>to me, though.  Do you mean you were born then?  Try using the verb {bogh}.
>{wejmaH ben jIbogh} "I was born 30 years ago."  Note the verb prefix here
>is {jI-}; it indicates the subject is "I" but there is no object.  The
>phrase {wejmaH ben} simply indicates when the action occurs/occurred.

What if Kenneth is wa'maHwej years old?  And, he did not quite write that
correctly?

peHruS


Back to archive top level