tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 03 22:15:10 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "under" (was KLBC:Name that Song)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: "under" (was KLBC:Name that Song)
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 01:14:38 -0400
In a message dated 96-06-01 15:07:24 EDT, you write:
>Again, {nagh bIngDaq} is a locative, not an object. The suffix {-Daq}
>is a dead giveaway that it can't be an object.
>
>-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj
I would really like to accept this answer as the final word. It fits my
Earthly way of thinking quite well. Thanks.
peHruS