tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 15 09:13:34 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBC:fractions & directions



>Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 16:21:26 -0800
>From: [email protected]

>In a message dated 96-02-14 12:29:26 EST, charghwI' writes:

>>Well, for starters it's a sentence and not a noun.  One has divided three
>>(isn't that backwards?).  Moreover, bear in mind that bare nouns in
>>Klingon, as in English, usually mean "one of them", "two of them", etc. in
>>context.  If You were talking about... I dunno, countries, and said "wej
>>wavta' wa'", I'd think you meant that one of the countries had managed to
>>divide three others (perhaps from each other, politically, maybe breaking
>>up an alliance.)

>As you say, English uses number words in the same way.  If, in English, I
>wanted to explain something using a number, I could easily make you
>understand me.  Klingon can do the same thing.  You'd have reason for talking
>about, say, dividing, and you'd make it clear that we are talking about
>mathematical division.  (For all we know, though, {wov} could only be used
>mathematically, or not!)

Good point.  I still find "wa' wavbogh wej" less than intuitive, but your
point makes a certain amount of sense.

>[. . .]
>>Besides, last I looked magnetism flowed as much south as
>>it did north; the business about one being forward and one backward is
>>completely arbitrary; why should Klingons have picked the same way?

>[. . .]

>>>using poS & nIH for left and right of spinward ?
>>
>>Wouldn't trust the magnetic field anyway; the usual definition of
>>north/south in astronomy depends on rotation (most planets rotate): the
>>rotation is clockwise around the south pole.

>The usual *human* definition, that is.  This definition is completely
>arbitrary; why should Klingons have picked the same way?  :)  Besides, we
>only have our one star's nine planets to compare, and even all of these don't
>rotate in the same direction.  For direction names, we'd need a Klingon to
>tell us what they are.  For Earth measurements, you could always state a
>course bearing ({He pagh pagh pagh} for north, {He wa chorgh pagh} or {He
>wavatlh chorghmaH} for south, etc.).  Too bad we can't give a distance in
>anything except Kellicams!

Indeed!  The poster had been looking for definitions of the human
directions, so that's what I was focussing on.  But there's no reason that
Klingons should do things the same way (we had a discussion about this a
few weeks ago, I recall).  Perhaps they indicate directions on-planet
towards famous cities/landmarks.  In Biblical Hebrew, "West" and "South"
are often referred to as "Seaward" and "Negev-ward" respectively,
i.e. towards the Mediterranean sea (which is west of Israel) and towards
the Negev desert, in the south.  I think these words are even used when the
action is taking place somewhere else, as fossilized constructions.  There
are many different options; there need not BE translations for
"north/south/east/west".

~mark


Back to archive top level