tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Feb 09 18:26:20 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: FOR MNIXON: list & name

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: FOR MNIXON: list & name
• Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 16:26:26 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <v01520d00ad3efafe2465@[205.139.170.201]> from "Alan Anderson" at Feb 7, 96 06:57:16 pm

According to Alan Anderson:
> 
> ghItlh charghwI':
> >bImIS. jabbI'IDleghDaq not <vIHarpu'> vIjatlh. jatlhpu' latlh.
> 
> jItlhIj.  pIch vIghaj.  ghItlhwI' vIngu'Ha'ba'.

qay'be'. ramqu'.

> >There's a rule that says you can't use perfective on the second
> >verb in a [verb 'e' verb] construction.
> 
> It's worse than that:  it can't take *any* type 7 verb suffix.

vISovpu'. nom vIghItlh 'ej jIqarHa'.
...

> -- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

• References:
  • Re: FOR MNIXON: list & name
    • From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: vInIDqa' (Re: KLBC: HIboQqa')
• Next by Date: mubechmoH to'baj nay'
• Prev by thread: Re: FOR MNIXON: list & name
• Next by thread: Re: FOR MNIXON: list & name
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level