tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 13 21:41:04 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
nach ghajnISqu''a' *relative clause*? (was: Re: chegh Qov)
- From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
- Subject: nach ghajnISqu''a' *relative clause*? (was: Re: chegh Qov)
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 21:38:04 -0700
batlh QaghwIj tu' ~mark:
}>qep'a' boDelmeH tlhIngan Hol bolo'taHvIS bep latlhpu'mo' jIHagh. jabbI'ID
}
}"bepmo' latlhpu'" Daja' DaneH, qar'a'?
vIHechba'. DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.
DaH Satlhab vIneH:
bom vIqonchugh qechvam bolaj'a': {wot wotbogh}. *stative verb* 'oH wot
cha'DIch'e'.
mutlheghmeyvam tIqel:
vIqon vImugh
'IH Doqbogh. [What is] red is beautiful.
qubbej Dunbogh. The wonderful is rare indeed.
potlh vIttaHbogh What continues to be true is important.
chol mIghbogh Evil draws near.
vIHajbogh vIqaDnIS I must challenge what I dread.
pIj qechvam vIja'meH DIp vISamlaH:{potlh vIt}. pIj <Doch> <wanI'> <vay'>
ghap vIchellaH: {qubbej Dochmey Dun} {chol vay' mIgh}. rut -ghach (-ghach'e'
Hajlu'bogh!) vIlo'laH: {potlh vIttaHghach}. chaq reH qechvam vIjunmeH
vIqonqa'laH.
motlh nach Hutlhbogh *relative clause*'e' lajlu'Qo' 'e' vISov. jIQochbe'.
'ach bomvaD jaS vIqon vIneHchugh bolaj'a'?
SKI (Summary for the Klingon-Impaired): Qov bids to restore lost honour,
then asks if a headless relative clause might be accepted under poetic licence.
---
Robyn Stewart
[email protected] --- Qovpatlh!? lagh 'oH Qov patlh'e'.
NEW EMAIL ADDRESS---PLEASE NOTE, AND USE THIS ONE NOW.