tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 13 13:01:14 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: KLBC: Bible translation



On Tue, 13 Aug 1996, A.Appleyard wrote:

>   Kenneth Traft <[email protected]> wrote:-
> > I had read somewhere that some scholars believe that the gospels were
> > written in Hebrew and translated into Greek/Aramaic. Something about the way
> > certain words / phrase appear in the Greek that don't jive with the normal
> > means of expression from Aramaic or something like that. ...
> 
> Or some parts were written in Greek by someone who knew Greek but his first
> language was Aramaic.
> 

the close proximity to greece makes these theories all plausible.  NOt to
throw a wrench  in the works or make myself seem unknowledgable, but
wasn't the area we are speaking of under roman control during the time of
Christ?  the gospels could have therefore been written decades later, and
written and re-written so that perfect translation would make it almost
impossible to decipher.  Furthermore, wouldn't the close proximity
generate similar language patterns in both hebrew and greek?  not
necessarily the mother languages, but the dialects?

jsut wondering if anyone could clear up my quanderies, that's all.  

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


"Mr. Gideon........

You're not paying attention!"


		Brandon Lee
		the Crow

Maddalena Romano
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://pages.nyu.edu/~mqr9304


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




Back to archive top level