tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Aug 13 01:32:49 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: tlhab jaj
- From: "A.Appleyard" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: tlhab jaj
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 09:32:16 GMT
- Organization: Materials Science Centre
- Priority: normal
ghItlhpu' Robert Darke <[email protected]>:-
> <Independence Day> vIleghnIS'a'? QaQ'a' 'oH? DaHjaj <UK>Daq So'Ha'pu' 'oH.
jangpu' "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>:-
> Although -bogh clauses are conjoined with "'ej" (per TKW), you are not here
> conjoining -bogh clauses; you're conjoining noun phrases ...
> I'm sorry, I can't follow this. I think I missed something.
naDev vIlughmoH 'e' vInID A.Appleyard:-
> QaQ 'oH. vIleghpu'.
> jabbI'IdghomDaq lut wanI'mey DIja'chuqchugh 'ej vaj lut De' wI'angchugh,
> (lut legh 'e' Hech nuvpu''e')vaD lut bel QIH 'oH
{lut legh 'e' Hech nuvpu''e'} = is a relative clause used as a noun, and
that noun wants a -vaD suffix: "for people who intend to see the story": where
should the -vaD go?