tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 08 09:09:48 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: TKD Question
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: TKD Question
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 12:09:43 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (messagefrom Daniel Peter Noll on Wed, 7 Aug 1996 20:55:15 -0700)
>Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 20:55:15 -0700
>From: Daniel Peter Noll <[email protected]>
>> I couldn't actually find {-ghach} in the TKD, I thought it was used to turn
>> verbs into nouns, that's why I put the {-Ha'} after {-ghach}
>{-ghach} is in the addendum to TKD, does indeed turn verbs into nouns, but
>is a type 9 suffix anyway, so as far as I know no other suffix, including
>rovers, can come after it.
Yes... -wI' is similar in these respects, differing in semantics. Though
of course, as has been pointed out, once the verb has been made into a
noun, you can then add NOUN suffixes to it (I recall canon "baHwI'pu'lI'":
your gunners.)
~mark