tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 05 09:24:08 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
KLBC: Trouble with {-moH} again... was Re: pong duj (again)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: KLBC: Trouble with {-moH} again... was Re: pong duj (again)
- Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 18:06:14 +0200
At 12:52 PM 31/7/96 -0700, ~mark wrote:
As answer to the statements made by ~mark, I wanted to say some tlhIngan
Hol. I still have trouble with the type 4 suffix {-moH} "cause".
>I'm not an expert, but I recall several instances of named Klingon ships.
>Riker served aboard a ship called the "pagh" (coincidental homophony with
>"nothing"? Intentional meaning? who knows);
HIja'
{pagh} vIQubmoH, 'aH 'oH {pagh} ({pagh} causes me to think it's paraphernalia)
>Gowron's ship is called the
>bortaS in the CD-ROM and maybe elsewhere.
HIja'
{bortaS}'e' DaSov DuleghmoH <ST> (ST causes you to know the {bortaS})
gowron 'oH, bortaSDaj'e' (It is Gowron, the Bortas is his)
(How would one say that the Bortas belongs to Gowron??? Would this be
correct???)
>'ach pongmey DIyajchu'be'. Huj pongmey: DIvI' Hol pongmey tlhIngan Hol
>pongmey je. motlhbe' chutchaj.
maj
>~mark
beHwI"av
--
*************************
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
*************************