tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 10 05:00:11 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Re[4]: ranks and titles (was Suppletion)
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Re[4]: ranks and titles (was Suppletion)
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 07:59:37 -0500
ghItlh yoDtargh:
>Therefore I think {ta'be'} would be appropriate to describe the female
>consort of an emperor, while {be'ta'} would be used if the sovereign
>were female.
I've been following this conversation with a little confusion. Is <ta'be>
canon? I don't know the source. Without that knowledge, I would have
thought that the gender of the ruler would be immaterial. The ruler would be
<ta'>, and his/her consort would be <be'nal> or <loDnal>.
jIlugh'a'?
SuStel
Hovjaj 95856.8