tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 31 10:52:18 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: -vaD vs. -Daq on pronouns

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: -vaD vs. -Daq on pronouns
• Date: Fri, 31 Mar 95 13:52:15 EST
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9503291914.A29424-0100000@netcom2>; from "R.B Franklin" at Mar 30, 95 12:08 am

According to R.B Franklin:
...
 
> I would say something like:
> 
> Hom ghorlu'pu'bogh vIvIHbe'moHmeH, DeSDajDaq naQ vIQeymoHnIS.

Little comment: ...DeSDaj naQDaq... Type 5 noun suffixes get
transferred to any adjectival verbs following the noun.

Beyond that, it seems a little cryptic to say that you must
cause the entire arm to be tight. I dunno...
... 
> yoDtargh

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: -vaD vs. -Daq on pronouns
    • From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: -vaD vs. -Daq on pronouns
    • From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Whose to be the new BG?
• Next by Date: words from Reunion
• Prev by thread: Re: -vaD vs. -Daq on pronouns
• Next by thread: Re: -vaD vs. -Daq on pronouns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level