tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 22 01:33:07 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Analysis of {mo'taq lut}
- From: "A.Appleyard" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Analysis of {mo'taq lut}
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 09:31:14 GMT
- Priority: normal
Jeremy Cowan <[email protected]> wrote (Subject: Re: Analysis of
{mo'taq lut}):-
> > * latlh jeychugh SuvwI' 'ach batlh ghajbe' vaj yay tu'be'lu'
> > @ If warrior defeat another but not have (with) honor,
> > @ one not find warrior's victory / then one not find victory
> > === Homophone ambiguity between the 2 meanings of {vaj}.
> vaj ... between two sentences causes some confusion. It was intended to be
> the subject of the preceding verb, not the possessor of the following noun.
> Anybody know how to clear this up?
Try {latlh jeychugh SuvwI' 'ach batlh ghajbe' vaj, yay tu'be'lu'.}
with a comma to separate the clauses.