tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 08 00:49:25 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: E pluribus unum: $0.02-wIj
- From: "A.Appleyard" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: E pluribus unum: $0.02-wIj
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 08:48:00 GMT
- Priority: normal
ghItlhpu' "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]> (Subject: Re: E
pluribus unum: $0.02-wIj):-
> > A literal translation of the original would seem to be {law'wI'vo' wa'}.
> Yes, though lacking a verb ... (bear in mind that Klingon does NOT have an
> implied copula ...
Sorry. {law'wI'vo' ghaH wa'} ?
> Close. But law' remains a verb; you can't use it as a noun in *wa' moj law'.
> You'd have to use law'wI', as has already been suggested. And it would have
> to be lumoj.
{wa' lumoj law'wI'} ?