tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 01 13:50:23 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

KLBC: E pluribus unum

• From: [email protected] (Steve Weaver)
• Subject: KLBC: E pluribus unum
• Date: Wed, 1 Mar 1995 16:50:04 -0500

So'wI' chu'Ha'lu'

chargwI': mughlu' qatuchqu'    >}};-)

KLBC:
I've been trying to get this for about a month now and nothing seems right.
I've settled on two different ways of saying "E pluribus unum" (out of
many, one), but I can't convince myself that either are correct. Please
review the constructs and explain why they are wrong. Thank you.

a)  wa' law'choH moj

b) law'vo' ghoS wa'bogh


I've also been trying to figure out if the "A Q law' B Q puS" construct is
applicable here or not, but can't really think of a way to say it that way.

Thanks

So'wI' chu'lu'ta'

      vay' yIHub Hoch 'ej Hoch tIHub vay'
                                          - DumaS
-------------------------------------------------
vIta'pu'be' !!!   tlhIngan ghaH *Bart Simpson*'e'
Steve Weaver       [email protected]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: KLBC: some sentences, 2
• Next by Date: Scrabble, third turn
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: some sentences, 2
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: E pluribus unum
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level