tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 28 13:20:13 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: More on "Which?"

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: More on "Which?"
• Date: Wed, 28 Jun 95 16:20:11 EDT
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Mark E. Shoulson" at Jun 28, 95 4:11 pm

According to Mark E. Shoulson:
> 
... 
> Once again, the reason I don't like "*nuqDIch" is that it attaches a
> numerical suffix (-DIch) to a question-word that doesn't seem the least bit
> numeric (nuq).  No matter what you say about possible meanings, unless you
> address that basic problem the construction will *still* bother me (now,
> whether or not the fact that it bothers *me* is at all significant is
> another question altogether).
 
yIyoq! pabpo' SoH! DunuQchugh mu' vaj mujlaw'.

> ~mark

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: More on "Which?"
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: More on "Which?"
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: IRCs and batlh'etlhmey
• Next by Date: Downtime -- The plan.
• Prev by thread: Re: More on "Which?"
• Next by thread: Re: More on "Which?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level