tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 23 07:36:27 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: maDochlaHtaH

From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: maDochlaHtaH
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 95 10:36:25 EDT
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9506211806.A532-0100000@netcom17>; from "R.B Franklin" at Jun 22, 95 8:58 am

According to R.B Franklin:
> 
> 
> Mon, 19 Jun 1995 ghItlh DaQtIq:
> 
> > chaq tugh tlhIngan Hol ghoj HatchoH
> 
> ghaytan <ghoj>Daq {-meH} DachelnIS.  I.e. chaq tugh tlhIngan Hol ghojmeH 
> HatchoH.

chaq yapbe' mu'tlheghlIj choHHom. <<chaq tugh thlIngan Hol
ghojmeH HatchoH Qu'.>> Otherwise, it looks like a "sentence as
subject" construction, which we can't have.

> > Qapla'
> > - DaQtIq
> 
> yoDtargh

charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

Follow-Ups:
- Re: maDochlaHtaH
  - From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: maDochlaHtaH
  - From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: That's my name, don't use it up.
Next by Date: Re: More on "Which?"
Prev by thread: Re: maDochlaHtaH
Next by thread: Re: maDochlaHtaH
Index(es):