chaq wa' mu' 'oH lItHa''e' vaj mawavbe'nIS qaStaHchugh wanI'vam mojaq 'oHbejbe' <Ha'>vam'e' vaj pagh ta'Ha' 'oH DaH mu' lItHa' pojlu' rIntaH qar'a' peHruS Perhaps <lItHa'> is one word; thus, we must not separate it. If this is the case, <Ha'> certainly is not just a suffix. Then, it is undoing nothing at all. Then, does this conclude the analysis of <lItHa'>?