tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 21 17:38:19 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -ghach revisited...
- From: [email protected] (David Barron)
- Subject: Re: -ghach revisited...
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 16:47:07 -0700
At 05:04 PM 4/21/95 -0400, Matt Gomes wrote:
>qaghItlhneS:
>
> I'm working hard to get my HyperKlingon parser to work really cool (thanks to
>Alan), and I came up with a question...
>
> Can verbs with the "-ghach" suffix have a prefix? I haven't seen any, but
>I thought I'd ask the masters...
>
Ha! Where have you been?
Sorry, seriously turn back a few issues of HolQeD and read the interview
with Marc Okrand ON THAT VERY SUBJECT.
In short, he says it is not against the rules but it makes the construction
very "wierd". So he recomends against it.
David Barron
> Qapla'!
>
>-majIq
>
>
David Barron [email protected] OR [email protected]
Klingon Language Postal Course
PO Box 37, Eagle ID 83616
IT'S FREE! Send Self-Addressed Stamped Envelope.
Not available by E-mail, so dont ask.