tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 18 06:13:15 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lutHom
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: lutHom
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 95 9:13:12 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Riku Anttila" at Apr 18, 95 3:06 am
According to Riku Anttila:
>
> > You call that conservative?-)
> >
> > I don't think the line in CK accomplishes anything. It's already
> > there in TKD - see {jubbe', motlhbe', lo'laHbe'}.
>
> Oh, forgot one thing. See also: {yepHa', belHa', yuDHa', QeyHa', jotHa'
> and QuchHa'}. Wouldn't it be great to use them adjectivally?
>
> .:ghor:.
Good points all. I would tend to open this up, then, since
these do seem to be verbs appropriate for adjectival use.
It is good to have so many eyes looking. Surely we shall find
more together than we could possibly, each to ourselves.
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |