tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 28 03:51:06 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jatlhwI' po'be'

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jatlhwI' po'be'
• Date: Tue, 28 Jun 94 15:47:48 EDT
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "[email protected]" at Jun 27, 94 6:51 pm

According to Guido:
... 
> {tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI' po' jIHbe'}

This is worthy of consideration, but I don't have a problem
with it only because it involves using the pronoun as a verb. I
have a problem with it because, since {jIHbe'} is a verb, this
sentence has two main verbs....

Wait a minute...

I get it.

Never mind. It seems mighty peculiar, but then this is a mighty
peculiar circumstance and maybe this solution is better than
anything else so far.

Okay. Fine. I can work with that.

charghwI'

• References:
  • jatlhwI' po'be'
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC (old)- SaQum
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC (old)- SaQum
• Prev by thread: jatlhwI' po'be'
• Next by thread: jatlhwI' po'be'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level