tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 24 01:40:59 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: FINALLY!!!!
>According to [email protected]:
>>
>> ..."[you] don't make me resume waiting *for you*". It would be
>> sufficient as {HIloSqa'moHQo'}.
>>
>>
>> Guido#1, Leader of All Guidos
>>
>I don't see where you are getting "for you". I read it as
>"[you, imperitive] Don't make me wait for ... again." Doesn't
>it need at least {SoH HIloSqa'moHQo'}?
>charghwI'
No, it's simply, "[you] don't make me wait for [indefinite object] again".
The adressee, /you/, is the *cause* of the waiting, so it's already perfectly
clear that /you/ is the one being waited for.
A somewhat more convoluted construction might yield {qaloStaH 'e'
yIqaSqa'moHQo'}.
Guido#1, Leader of All Guidos